Nasze serwisy używają informacji zapisanych w plikach cookies. Korzystając z serwisu wyrażasz zgodę na używanie plików cookies zgodnie z aktualnymi ustawieniami przeglądarki, które możesz zmienić w dowolnej chwili. Więcej informacji odnośnie plików cookies.

Obowiązek informacyjny wynikający z Ustawy z dnia 16 listopada 2012 r. o zmianie ustawy – Prawo telekomunikacyjne oraz niektórych innych ustaw.

Wyłącz komunikat

 
 

Logowanie

Logowanie za pomocą Centralnej Usługi Uwierzytelniania PRz. Po zakończeniu pracy nie zapomnij zamknąć przeglądarki.

Modern Management Review (dawna nazwa: Zarządzanie i Marketing)

Modern Management Review
(dawna nazwa: Zarządzanie i Marketing)
26 (1/2021), DOI: 10.7862/rz.2021.mmr.01

ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS OF REGULATION AND COUNTERING ABUSES IN PROPERTY RELATIONS

Nataliia GERASYMCHUK

DOI: 10.7862/rz.2021.mmr.01

Abstract

Institutions are made up of formal rules (constitutions, laws, and regulations) and informal
constraints (conventions and norms of behavior), and the way both are enforced. Wellspecified property rights that reward a productive and creative activity, a legal system that
enforces such laws at low cost, and internal codes of conduct that are complementary to such
formal rules are the essential underpinning to productive economy. In order to counteract the
illegal property redistribution, it is necessary to have a complex system of uniform norms and
interrelated standards of practice, such as legal framework, common policy in the field of law
enforcement and coherent policy of economic security. In the article the system of regulation
of property rights institutions in Ukraine has been analyzed and an effective option has
been suggested. They were based on the economic interest more than on administrative
enforcement.

 

Full text (pdf)

References

  1. Antoniuk, N. A. (2019). Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Anti-Crisi Management of the National Economy in the Context of Decentralization: a monograph. Lutsk: Eastern European National University named after Lesia Ukrainka.
  2. Arefieva, O. V., Vovk, O. M., Posypaiko, Ye. A. (2020). Intensification of material andtechnical support formation of an enterprise in the conditions of neoindustrialmodernization. “Economics bulletin of the National Mining University” No. 2 (70). DOI:10.33271/ev/70.123.
  3. Development of agricultural entrepreneurship: trends and prospects (2012). Proceedings of the Fourth International Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists. Kyiv: NSC„Institute of Agrarian Economics”.
  4. Hanushchak-Efimenko L. M., Shcherbak V. G. (2016). Innovative entrepreneurship development based on cluster organization. Actual problems of economics” No. 11(185).
  5. Hodgson, G. M. (1989). Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  6.  
  7. Lisovyi A. V. (2018). Tax regulation of development of rural territories of Ukraine:a monograph. Melnyk Publishing House.
  8. Lisovyi, А. V., Gerasymchuk N. А., Bodnarchuk O. H. (2018). Analysis of motivation forderegulation of entrepreneurial activity as the main way to reduce administrative barriers in the economy. “Scientific bulletin of Polissia” No. 1 (13), P. 1
  9. Malik M. Y., Shpykulyak O. G. (2010). Institutionalization of agrarian entrepreneurship:transformation and efficiency. „Economy of agro-industrial complex” No. 7.
  10. Meyers, W. H., Demyanenko, S. I., Johnson, T. G., Zorya, S. I. (2005). Refocusing Agricultural
  11. and Rural Development Policies in Ukraine: Action Plan for the Road Ahead. WashingtonDC: USAID.
  12. Nitsenko, V. (2020). Mismanagement in Ukraine. “Problems of Management in the 21stCentury” No. 15(1). DOI: 10.33225/pmc/20.15.04.
  13. North D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  14. Olson, M. (2000). Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorship.New York: Basic Books.
  15. Shpikuliak, O. H. (2008). Institutional peculiarities of entrepreneurship and social capitaldevelopment in agrarian sphere. „Agrosvit” No. 11.
  16. Sonin, K. (2005). Institutional theory of infinite redistribution. „Questions of economics”,No. 7.State Statistical Service of Ukraine. Access on the internet: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
  17. Stepanenko, S. V. (2008). Institutional analysis of economic systems (problems of methodology).Kyiv: KNEU.
  18. The handbook of research on entrepreneurship in agriculture and rural development (2011). Edited by Gry Agnete Alsos, Sara Carter, Elisabet Ljunggren and Friederike Welter. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  19. Titenko, Z. M. (2017). System of electronic administration of value added tax for agriculturalproducers. “Economic Bulletin of the Zaporizhia State Engineering Academy” No. 2 (2).
  20. Vasurenko, L. V., Kuksa, I. N, Shtuler, I. U. (2019). Determination of the level of state regulation of arrangements for the payment of labour by method clustering of branches of national economy. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice” No. 29, Vol. 2.DOI: 10.18371/fcaptp.v2i29.171901.
  21. World Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (2011), Edited by Leo-Paul Dana. Edward Elgar
    Publishing Limited

About this Article

TITLE:
ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS OF REGULATION AND COUNTERING ABUSES IN PROPERTY RELATIONS

AUTHORS:
Nataliia GERASYMCHUK

AUTHORS AFFILIATIONS:
1. Department of Economics, Rzeszow University of Technology

JOURNAL:
Modern Management Review
26 (1/2021)

KEY WORDS AND PHRASES:
economic institutions, economic policy, macroeconomics, microeconomics,
property relations

FULL TEXT:
http://doi.prz.edu.pl/pl/pdf/zim/443

DOI:
10.7862/rz.2021.mmr.01

URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7862/rz.2021.mmr.01

COPYRIGHT:
Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów

POLITECHNIKA RZESZOWSKA im. Ignacego Łukasiewicza; al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów
tel.: +48 17 865 11 00, fax.: +48 17 854 12 60
Administrator serwisu:

Deklaracja dostępności | Polityka prywatności