THE CONCEPT OF MAPPING THE BENCHMARKING PARTNERSHIPS OF CLUSTER ENTERPRISES – THEORETICAL APPROACH

Benchmarking is a response to the needs of contemporary enterprises participating in clusters, that search for solutions to increase efficiency and effectiveness of processes and to improve their competitive advantage. At the same time, the ability to build and develop partnership relations by cluster members is currently one of the key conditions of their external growth. The valid and important field of scientific research is intra-cluster benchmarking partnership. So far, none of the researchers has performed theoretical analyses in terms of the possibility of benchmarking adjustment to the needs of cluster members.

The purpose of the paper is to present the essence of benchmarking partnership of cluster enterprises and the concept of mapping of data and information exchange in intra-cluster benchmarking based on partnership. The main research methods are as follows: the analysis of literature sources and deductive reasoning. The selection of the specific field of theoretical considerations and conceptual works has been motivated by the identified knowledge gap within the scope of the indicated elements of the concept of benchmarking partnership of cluster enterprises.

In view of the presented definitions of basic conceptual categories closely related to the analysed form of partnership, it has been assumed that the essence of benchmarking partnership of cluster enterprises is a mutually beneficial exchange of information between cluster members, concerning their performance and best practices, according to partnership rules, that leads to improvement of performance of the parties involved in the benchmarking process.

Full text (pdf)

1. Czakon W., Fernandez A.S., Minà A., Editorial – From Paradox to Practice: the Rise of Coopetition Strategies, „International Journal of Business Environment” 2014, 6/1.
2. Czakon W., Rogalski M., Coopetition Typology Revisited – a Behavioural Approach, „International Journal of Business Environment” 2014, 6/1.
3. De LurdesVeludo M., Business Relationships in the Automotive and Component Industries in Portugal, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Business and Management University of Glasgow, Glasgow 2005, http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1544/1/2005veludophd.pdf (available: 13.03.2018).
4. Hamel G., Doz Y.L., Prahalad C.K., Collaborate with Your Competitors and Win, „Harvard Business Review” 1989, 67/1.
5. Latusek-Jurczak D., Formy współpracy międzyorganizacyjnej [w:] Relacje międzyorganizacyjne w naukach o zarządzaniu, red. A.K. Koźmiński, D. Latusek-Jurczak, WoltersKluwer business, Warszawa 2014.
6. Mattessich P.W., Murray-Close M., Monsey B.R., Collaboration: What Makes It Work. A Review of Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration, Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota 2001.
7. Moore J., Curry S.R., The Death of Competition, „Fortune” 1996, 133/7.
8. Rigsbee E., PartnerSHIFT. How to Profit from the Partnering Trend, John Wiley and Sons, New York 2000.
9. Szydełko M., Atrybuty i czynniki sukcesu partnerstwa przedsiębiorstw, „Modern Management Review” 2014, XIX/4.
10. Szydełko M., Ramy koncepcyjne zastosowania benchmarkingu w klastrze, „Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu” 2015/399.
11. Sharma R.S., Iqbal M., Victoriano M., On the Use of Benchmarking and Good Practices for Knowledge Management for Development, “Knowledge Management Research & Practice” 2013, 11/4.
12. Porter M.E., On Competition, Harvard Business School Press, Boston 1998.
13. Wireman T., Benchmarking Best Practices in Maintenance Management, Industrial Press, New York 2004.
14. Bendell T., Boulter L., Goodstadt P., Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage, Financial Times Pitman Publishing, London 1998.