Nasze serwisy używają informacji zapisanych w plikach cookies. Korzystając z serwisu wyrażasz zgodę na używanie plików cookies zgodnie z aktualnymi ustawieniami przeglądarki, które możesz zmienić w dowolnej chwili. Więcej informacji odnośnie plików cookies.

Obowiązek informacyjny wynikający z Ustawy z dnia 16 listopada 2012 r. o zmianie ustawy – Prawo telekomunikacyjne oraz niektórych innych ustaw.

Wyłącz komunikat

 
 

Logowanie

Logowanie za pomocą Centralnej Usługi Uwierzytelniania PRz. Po zakończeniu pracy nie zapomnij zamknąć przeglądarki.

Modern Management Review (dawna nazwa: Zarządzanie i Marketing)

Modern Management Review
(dawna nazwa: Zarządzanie i Marketing)
25 (2/2018), DOI: 10.7862/rz.2018.mmr.14

SELF-PRESENTATION STRATEGIES APPLIED BY ACADEMIC TEACHERS AT UNIVERSITIES IN RZESZÓW AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACT ON STUDENTS: A CASE OF SELF-PROMOTION AND EXEMPLIFICATION

Magdalena KRAWIEC
Submitted by: Paweł Perz

DOI: 10.7862/rz.2018.mmr.14

Abstract

The paper analyzes the application of self-presentation strategies in academic surroundings, and juxtaposes them with potential impact they may have on students. The data presented in the article constitute an excerpt of research on the application of five self-presentation strategies, i.e. ingratiation, intimidation, self-promotion, supplication, exemplification by academic teachers in Rzeszów, Poland, conducted in February and March 2018. Self-presentation, in simplified terms, constitutes the choice of behaviours to intentionally manage the impressions that others form of us, whereas a self-presentation strategy encompasses means of behaviour used to create a desirable image. The study encompasses 100 academic teachers, both men and women, between 26 and 62, employed at universities in Rzeszów. The research conducted by means of an online questionnaire indicated that self-promotion and exemplification were the least frequently applied choices. The rationale behind this result may be found in teacher’s reluctance to appear as showing off or being vainglorious. Each of the strategies was covered by 5 questions thematically connected to them. While constructing the questions, it was attempted to adjust them thematically to the strategy in question as strongly as possible. Characteristic features of the two strategies were taken into account while shaping the cognitive reality around a question.

Full text (pdf)

References

  1. Akerlof G.A, Kranton R.E., Economics and Identity, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, Vol. 115/3, Oxford, 2000.
  2. Akerlof G.A., Kranton R.E., Identity  Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work,  Wages and Well-Being, Princeton University Press 2010.
  3. Ames C., Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation, “ Journal of Educational Psychology”, Vol. 84, University of Illinois Press, Illinois 1992.
  4. Ames C., Archer J., Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes, “Journal of Educational Psychology”, Vol. 80/3, Illinois 1988.
  5. Arkin R.M., Baumgardner A.H., Self-handicapping [in:] Basic issues in attribution theory and research, eds. J.H. Harvey and G. Weary, Academic Press, New York 1985.
  6. Baumeister R.F., A self-presentational view of social phenomena, “Psychological Bulletin”, Vol. 91, Washington 1982.
  7. Baumeister R.F., Tice D.M., Hutton D.G., Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem, “Journal of Personality”, Vol. 57, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1989.
  8. Baumeister R.F., Leary M.R., The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation, “Psychological Bulletin”, 117, Washington 1995.
  9. Baumeister R.F., The self [in:] The Handbook of Social Psychology, eds. D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, G. Lindzey, New York 1998.
  10. Bénabou R., Tirole J., Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, “The Review of Economic Studies”, Vol. 70/3, London 2003.
  11. Bénabou R., Tirole J., Incentives and Prosocial Behavior, “American Economic Review”, Vol. 96/5, American Economic Association 2006.
  12. Bursztyn L., Jensen R., Social Image and Economic Behavior in the Field: Identifying, Understanding, and Shaping Social Pressure, “Annual Review of Economics”, Vol. 9/1, Palo Alto, USA 2017.
  13. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F, Aspects of self, and the control of behavior [in:] The self and social life, ed. B.R. Schlenker, New York 1985.
  14. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M., The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behaviour [in:] Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 11, London, 2000.
  15. Dweck C., Motivational processes affecting learning, “American Psychologist”, Washington, 1986.
  16. Dweck C., Leggett E., A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality, “Psychological Review”, Vol. 95, Washington 1988.
  17. Goffman E., The presentation of self in everyday life, Doubleday, New York 1959.
  18. Jones E.E., Pittman T.S., Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation [in:] Psychological perspectives on the self, ed. J. Suls, New York 1982.
  19. Jones E.E., Interpersonal perception, W.H. Freeman and Co, New York 1990.
  20. Leary M.R., Kowalski R.M., Impression management: A literature review and two-component model, “Psychological Bulletin”, Washington 1990.
  21. Maehr M., Midgley C., Enhancing student motivation: A school-wide approach [in:] Educational Psychologist, London 1991.
  22. McCall G.J., Identities and interactions, The Free Press, New York 1966.
  23. Mead G.H., Mind self, and society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1934.
  24. Montalvo G.P., Pleasing the teacher: A student perspective, Unpublished manuscript, 1995.
  25. Montalvo G.P., Roedel T., Pleasing the teacher: A qualitative look, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco 1995.
  26. Newman R., What do I need to do to succeed when I don’t understand what I’m doing: Developmental influences on student adaptive help seeking [in:] Development of Achievement Motivation, eds. A. Wigfield and S. Eccles, San Diego, CA: Academic Press 2002.
  27. Park R.E., Human nature and collective behavior, “American Journal of Sociology”, Vol. 32, Chicago 1927.
  28. Rosenberg M., Conceiving the self, Basic Books, New York 1979.
  29. Sarbin T.R., Allen V.L., Role theory [in:] The handbook of social psychology, eds. G. Lindzey, E. Aronson, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley 1968.
  30. Schlenker B.R., Self-presentation: Managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancement, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Washington 1975.
  31. Scheier M.F., Carver C.S., Two sides of the self: One for you and one for me [in:] Psychological perspectives on the self, eds. J. Suls, A.G., Greenwald. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1982.
  32. Schlenker B.R., Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relationships, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole 1980.
  33. Schlenker B.R., Leary M.R., Audiences’ reactions to self-enhancing, self-denigrating, and accurate self-presentations, “Journal of Experimental Social Psychology”, Washington 1982.
  34. Schlenker B.R., Identity and self-identification [in:] The self and social life, ed. B.R. Schlenker, McGraw-Hill, New York 1985.
  35. Schlenker B.R, Weigold M.F., Goals and the self-identification process: Constructing desired identities [in:] Goal concepts in personality and social psychology, ed. L.A. Pervin, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 1989.
  36. Schlenker B.R., Trudeau J.V., The impact of self-presentations on private self-beliefs: Effects of prior self-beliefs and misattribution, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Washington 1990.
  37. Schlenker B.R., Self-presentation [in:] Handbook of Self and Identity, eds. M.R. Leary and J.P. Tangney, New York 2003.
  38. Schneider D.J., Tactical self-presentations: Toward a broader conception [in:] Impression management theory and social psychological research, ed. J.T. Tedeschi, New York 1981.
  39. Stryker S., Statham A., Symbolic interaction and role theory [in:] The handbook of social psychology, eds. G. Lindzey, E. Aronson, Random House, New York 1985.
  40. Swann W.B., To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification [in:] Motivation and cognition, eds. R.M. Sorrentino, E.T. Higgins, New York 1990.
  41.      Tangney J.P., Dearing R.L., Shame and guilt, New York 2002.
  42. Tedeschi J. T., Private and public experiences and the self [in:] Public self and private life, ed. R.F. Baumeister, Springer-Verlag, New York 1986.
  43. Thagard P., Wood J.V., Eighty phenomena about the self: Representation, evaluation, regulation, and change, “Frontiers in Psychology”, Vol. 6, Seattle 2015.
  44. Tice D.M., Butler J.L., Muraven M.B., Stillwell A.M, When modesty prevails: differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Washington 1995.
  45. Tice D.M., Wallace H.M., The reflected self: creating yourself as (you think) others see you [in:] Handbook of Self and Identity, eds. M.R. Leary and J.P. Tangney, New York 2003.
  46. Wicklund R.A., Gollwitzer P.M., Symbolic self-completion, New York 1982.

About this Article

TITLE:
SELF-PRESENTATION STRATEGIES APPLIED BY ACADEMIC TEACHERS AT UNIVERSITIES IN RZESZÓW AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACT ON STUDENTS: A CASE OF SELF-PROMOTION AND EXEMPLIFICATION

AUTHORS:
Magdalena KRAWIEC

AUTHORS AFFILIATIONS:
Institute of English Studies, Faculty of Philology, University of Rzeszów

SUBMITTED BY:
Paweł Perz

JOURNAL:
Modern Management Review
25 (2/2018)

KEY WORDS AND PHRASES:
self-presentation, strategy, self-promotion, exemplification, academic teacher

FULL TEXT:
http://doi.prz.edu.pl/pl/pdf/zim/333

DOI:
10.7862/rz.2018.mmr.14

URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7862/rz.2018.mmr.14

COPYRIGHT:
Publishing House of Rzeszow University of Technology Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow

POLITECHNIKA RZESZOWSKA im. Ignacego Łukasiewicza; al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów
tel.: +48 17 865 11 00, fax.: +48 17 854 12 60
Administrator serwisu: