MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOPARKS IN TRANSITIVE COUNTRIES UNDER CONDITIONS OF GLOBALIZATION

The aim of work was to investigate the shapes of the innovative environment of the past
and the new ones of post-industrial information society, the specificity of technology parks
has been allocated. Analysis of the practice of creating industrial parks in the United States,
Europe, Israel, Russia and Ukraine showed differences in approaches in the West and former
Soviet Union. In the former case, they create a fundamentally new model of innovative
processes management, reflecting the specifics of new social system, in the latter there is an
attempt to modernize and adapt the old form to new tasks, which increases the gap in science
and technology as well as the economic dependence of the post-Soviet countries. Globalization
provides both a challenge and new opportunities for the development of countries
as well as the global market. Creating technology parks can help transition countries emerge
from the crisis and compete on an equal footing with the leading world economy players.
Technology parks can collaborate with other types of innovative environment: university laboratories,
research institutes, research and production complexes. They can be included as
structural subsystems into larger scientific-industrial associations, preserving their own
characteristics and autonomy. The proposed theoretical concept of controlling technology
parks is adequate to cultural patterns, resource and development needs of the country, finishing
their transition to the information society. It may get businesspersons, researchers and
political circles interested. Obviously, this model needs to be tested in practice. In case of
successful approbation in Ukraine, it may be implied in the innovative environment of other
transition countries.

Full text (pdf)

[1] Bell D., The coming of Post-Industrial society, Heinemann Educational, London 1974,
http://www.polybiblio.com/lameduck/688.Html.
[2] Castells M., An Introduction of the Information Age, “City” 1997/7, p. 6–16.
[3] Castells M., The Rise of Network Society, Vol. 1: Of the Information Age: Economy, Society
and Culture, Blackwell, Oxford 1996.
[4] Chipko Т.М., Technoparks in Ukraine, http://www.geograf.com.ua/geoinfocentre /20-humangeography-
ukraine-world/759-tekhnoparki-ukrajini.
[5] Eco-Industrial Parks: A Handbook for Local Development Teams, RPP International 1998,
http://gei.ucsc.edu/eco-industrial_parks.html.
[6] Europe and Central Asia Regional Conference on Industrial Parks, 17–18 April 2012, Baku,
Azerbaijan, https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media/UNIDO_Worldwide/Europe_
and_NIS_Programme.
[7] Kompanzheva L., Contsept informationogo obschestva kak cognitivnaya osnovai zmenenuy
yazukovoj kartinu mira sovremenogo obschestva, “Naykоvy zapiski. Vypysk” 89/1 (2010), p.
250–254.
[8] Festel G., Würmseher M., Challenges and strategies for chemical/industrial parks in Europe,
“Journal of Business Chemistry” 2013/06, http://www.businesschemistry. org/article/ ?article=
173.
[9] May Ch., The Information Society: A Sceptual view, Polity Press, USA 2000.
[10] Gore A., Basic Principles for Building an Information Society, “International Information
Communication and Education” 1996/2, p. 226–228.
[11] Ponyatie, funkzhii I zadachi of technoparkov, “Expert RA” 2015, http://www.raexpert.ru/
researches/technopark/part1.
[12] Technoparki stran mira: organizazhiya deyatelnosti I sravnenie, ed. V.A. Barinovoy, “Delo”
RANXiGS 2012.
[13] Waller W.T., Ceremonial Encapsulation and Corporative Culture Hegemony, “Journal Economic
Issues” 1987/21, p. 121–128.