Nasze serwisy używają informacji zapisanych w plikach cookies. Korzystając z serwisu wyrażasz zgodę na używanie plików cookies zgodnie z aktualnymi ustawieniami przeglądarki, które możesz zmienić w dowolnej chwili. Więcej informacji odnośnie plików cookies.

Obowiązek informacyjny wynikający z Ustawy z dnia 16 listopada 2012 r. o zmianie ustawy – Prawo telekomunikacyjne oraz niektórych innych ustaw.

Wyłącz komunikat

 
 

Logowanie

Logowanie za pomocą Centralnej Usługi Uwierzytelniania PRz. Po zakończeniu pracy nie zapomnij zamknąć przeglądarki.

Modern Management Review (dawna nazwa: Zarządzanie i Marketing)

Modern Management Review
(dawna nazwa: Zarządzanie i Marketing)
21 (4/2014), DOI: 10.7862/rz.2014.mmr.55

IS GMO “SUSTAINABLE”? A REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS OF GM PLANTS IN COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC CROPS

Anna PRUSAK, Gene ROWE, Jacek STROJNY

DOI: 10.7862/rz.2014.mmr.55

Abstract

The present paper aims to review and discuss potential and existing risks of GM crops to the
environment, in comparison with organic and conventional agriculture. The review of over 30
relevant papers on the environmental effects of modern agriculture allowed us to define five main
sources of risks, namely: 1) Pollution by synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, 2) Exploitation of
marginal lands and protection of natural habitats, 3) Gene flow, invasiveness and “superweeds”,
4) Impact on non-target species, particularly pollinators, 5) Biodiversity of crops and wildlife.
Although these effects are typically considered with respect to GM crops, the paper compares
them with conventional and organic systems. The review shows that each factor, except for the
“Gene flow, invasiveness and superweeds” (which is a risk specific to GM crops), may have positive
and negative effect dependent on the breeding method. For example, conventional crops require
the use of a large amount of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, unlike organic crops, while
GM agriculture reduces the use of pesticides. Moreover, some risks typically associated with
transgenic crops, i.e. decrease of genetic biodiversity, may also arise from conventional agriculture.
The paper concludes that there is no perfect agricultural option and trade-offs are needed to
satisfy the need for sustainability.

Full text (pdf)

References

[1] 97/618/EC, Commission Recommendation of 29 July 1997 concerning the scientific aspects
and the presentation of information necessary to support applications for the placing on the
market of novel foods and novel food ingredients and the preparation of initial assessment reports
under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text
with EEA relevance)
[2] Al-Babili S., Beyer P., Golden Rice – five years on the road – five years to go?, “Trends in Plant
Science” 10/12 (2005), p. 565–573.
[3] Anderson D., Biotechnology Risks Management: The Case of Genetically Modified Organisms
(GMOs), “CPCU Journal” 2001.
[4] Bertolla F., Simonet P., Horizontal gene transfers in the environment: natural transformation as a
putative process for gene transfers between transgenic plants and microorganisms, “Res. Microbiol.”
150/6 (1999), p. 375–384.
[5] Celec P., Kukuckova M., Renczesova et al., Biological and biomedical aspects of genetically modified
food, “Biomed Pharmacother“ 2005/59, p. 531–540.
[6] Commission Regulation (EC), No 641/2004 of 6 April 2004 on detailed rules for the implementation
of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards
the application for the authorisation of new genetically modified food and feed, the notification of
existing products and adventitious or technically unavoidable presence of genetically modified material
which has benefited from a favourable risk evaluation.
[7] Core J. New Rice Line Could Benefit Malnourished Populations. USDA Agricultural Research
Service 2002, http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2002/020913.htm (accessed: January 2008).
[8] Davidson E., A view from the genome: spatial control of transcription in sea urchin development,
“Curr. Opinion Genetics Development” 9/5 (1999), p. 530–541.
[9] Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the
deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms (repealing Council Directive
90/220/EEC).
[10] Executive Summary, Genetically modified foods for human health and nutrition: the scientific basis
for benefit/risk assessment, “Trends Food Sci. Technol.” 2003/14, p. 173–181.
[11] FAO/WHO, Codex Alimentarius: HACCP System and Guidelines for its Application. Food Hygiene
Basic Texts, FAO/WHO, Rome 2001.
[12] Finucane M., Holup J., Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically
modified food: an overview of the literature, “Social Sci. Medicine” 2005/60, p. 1603–1612.
[13] Food Biotechnology, A Communications Guide to Improving Understanding, 2012,
http://www.foodinsight.org/Resources/Detail.aspx?topic=Food_Biotechnology_A_Communication
s_Guide_to_Improving_Understanding_ (accessed December 2013).
[14] Frenich A., Bolaños P., Vidal J., Multiresidue analysis of pesticides in animal liver by gas chromatography
using triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry, “J. Chromatography A” 1153/1–2
(2007), p. 194–202.
68 G. Rowe, How can genetically modified foods be made publicly acceptable?, “Trends in Biotechnology” 22/3
(2004), p. 107–109.
[15] Gebhard F., Smalla K. Monitoring field releases of genetically modified sugar beets for persistence
of transgenic plant DNA and horizontal gene transfer, “FEMS Microbiol Ecol.” 28/3
(1999), p. 261–272.
[16] Gertsberg D., Loss of Biodiversity and Genetically Modified Crops, “GMO Journal, Food Safety
Politics” 2011, http://gmo-journal.com/2011/06/17/loss-of-biodiversity-and-genetically-modifiedcrops/
(accessed December 2013).
[17] Guttieria M., Bowena D., Dorschb J. et al., Identification and characterization of a low phytic acid
wheat, “Crop Sci” 2004/44, p. 418–424.
[18] Leff L., Dana J., McArthur J. et al., Detection of Tn5-like sequences in kanamycin-resistant
stream bacteria and environmental DNA, “Applied and Environmental Microbiology”
1993/59, p. 417–421.
[19] Lesueur C., Knittl P., Gartner M. et al., Analysis of 140 pesticides from conventional farming foodstuff
samples after extraction with the modified QuECheRS method, “Food Control” 19/9 (2008), p.
906–914.
[20] Lopez-Espinosa M., Lopez-Navarrete E., Rivas A. et al., Organochlorine pesticide exposure in
children living in southern Spain, “Environm Res” 106/1 (2008), p. 1–6.
[21] Mota M., Empis J., Novel foods and food ingredients: what is the mission of scientists and technologists?,
“Trends Food Sci. Technol.” 11/4–5 (2000), p. 161–168.
[22] Nielsen K., Bones A., Smalla K. et al., Horizontal gene transfer from transgenic plants to terrestrial
bacteria – a rare event?, “FEMS Microbiol Rev.” 22/2 (1998), p. 79–103.
[23] Noussair S., Do consumers really refuse to buy genetically modified food?, “Econom. J.” 114/1
(2004), p. 102–120.
[24] Novak W., Haslberger A. Substantial equivalence of antinutrients and inherent plant toxins in
genetically modified novel foods, “Food Chem. Toxicol.” 38/6 (2000), p. 473–483.
[25] Pelizzoni L., Democracy and the governance of uncertainty. The case of agricultural gene technologies,
“J. Hazard. Materials” 2001/86, p. 205–222.
[26] Porta M., Puigdomènech E., Ballester F. et al., Monitoring concentrations of persistent organic
pollutants in the general population: The international experience, “Environm. Internat.” 34/4
(2008), p. 546–561.
[27] Potrykus I., Nutritionally enhanced rice to combat malnutrition disorders of the poor, “Nutr. Rev.”
61/6 (2003), p. S101–S104.
[28] Prusak A., Schlegel-Zawadzka M., Food health quality of genetically modified crops – review of
risks and benefits, “Military Pharmacy and Medicine” 2013/VI-2, p. 13–18.
[29] Purchase I: What determines the acceptability of genetically modified food that can improve human
nutrition?, “Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.” 2005/207: S19–S27.
[30] Rowe G., How can genetically modified foods be made publicly acceptable?, “Trends in Biotechnology”
22/3 (2004), p. 107–109.
[31] Schmidt Ch.W., Genetically Modified Foods: Breeding Uncertainty, “Environm Health Perspect.”
113/8 (2005), p. 526–533.
[32] Smalla K., van Overbeek L., Pukall R. et al., Prevalence of NPTII and Tn5 in Kanamycin Resistant
Bacteria From Different Environments, “FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.” 1993/13, p. 47–58.
[33] Statement of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on the safe use of the nptII
antibiotic resistance marker gene in genetically modified plants, EFSA 2007,
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178620775641.htm (accessed February
2007).
[34] Twardowski T., Zimny J., Twardowska A., Biobezpieczeństwo biotechnologii, 1st edition, Edytor,
Poznań 2003.
[35] van den Bergh J., Holley J., An environmental-economic assessment of genetic modification of
agricultural crops, “Futures” 34/9–10 (2002), p. 807–822.
[36] Wagner W., Sustainable agriculture: how to sustain a production system in a changing environment,
“International Journal for Parasitology” 29/1 (1999), p. 1–5.
[37] Węgleński P., GMO, “Aura” 2006/2.
[38] Ikerd, J (1993) The need for a system approach to sustainable agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems
& Environment, 46 (1-4): 147-160;
[39] Ikerd, J quoted by Duesterhaus, 1990 in: Sustainability’s Promise, Journal of Soil and Water
Conservation (Jan.-Feb. 1990) 45 (1): p.4.
[40] Earles, R. (2005) Sustainable agriculture: An Introduction. [Internet]. ATTRA.
<http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/summaries/sustagintro.html>. [Accessed 11th April 2008]
[41] Champeil, A, Fourbet, J, Doré, T and Rossignol, L (2004) Influence of cropping system on
Fusarium head blight and mycotoxin levels in winter wheat. Crop Protection, 23 (6): 531-537
[42] Eicher, A (2003) Organic Agriculture. A Glossary of Terms for Farmers and Gardeners. [Internet].
University of California Cooperative Extension. <http://www.cehumboldt.
ucdavis.edu/files/8286.pdf>. [Accessed 11th April 2008]
[43] Pacini, C, Wossink, A, Giesen, G, Vazzana, C and Huirne, R (2003) Evaluation of sustainability
of organic, integrated and conventional farming systems: a farm and field-scale analysis.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95 (1): 273-288
[44] Andow, D and Hidaka K (1998) Yield loss in conventional and natural rice farming systems.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 70 (2-3): 151-158
[45] Clark, M, Horwath, W, Shennan, C, Scow, K, Lantni, T and Ferris, H (1999) Nitrogen, weeds
and water as yield-limiting factors in conventional, low-input, and organic tomato systems.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 73 (3): 257-270
[46] Levidow, L and Boschert, K (2008) Coexistence or contradiction? GM crops versus alternative
agricultures in Europe. Geoforum, 39 (1): 174-190
[47] Linacre, N, Gaskell, J, Rosegrant, M, Falck-Zapeda, J, Quemada, H, Halsey, M and Birner, R
(2006) Strategic environmental assessment for genetically modified organisms. Impact Assessment
and Project Appraisal, 24 (1): 35-43
[48] Renn, O (1992) Risk communication: towards a rational discourse with the public. Journal of
Hazardous Materials, 29: 465-519
[49] Slovic P (2001) The risk game. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 86 (1-3): 17–24
[50] FAO/WHO (1995) Application of risk analysis to food standards issues. Report on the joint
FAO/WHO expert consultation, Geneva, Switzerland, 13-17 March 1995
[51] Prudente, M, Malarvannan, G and Tanabe, S (2007) Persistent Toxic Substances in the Philippine
Environment. Developments in Environmental Sciences, 7: 559-585
[52] Gui, W-J, Wang, S-T, Guo, Y-R and Zhu, G-N (2008) Development of a one-step strip for the
detection of triazophos residues in environmental samples. Analytical Biochemistry, In Press,
Uncorrected Proof, Available online 14 March 2008
[53] Phipps, R and Park, J (2002) Environmental benefits of genetically modified crops: global and
European perspectives on their ability to reduce pesticide use. Journal of Animal and Feed
Sciences, 11: 1-18
[54] Tilman, D, Reich, P, Knops, J, Wedin, D, Mielke, T and Lehman, C (2001) Diversity and
Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment. Science, 294 (5543): 843-845
[55] Burssens, S and van Montagu, M (1999) Why do we need genetically modified plants?. In:
Highlights in European Plant Biotechnology Research and Technology Transfer. Proceedings
of the Second European Conference on Plant Biotechnology, Rome, Italy, 7-9 June 1999
[56] Mannion, A (1995) Agriculture, environment and biotechnology. Agriculture, Ecosystems &
Environment, 53 (1): 31-45
[57] Conner, A, Glare, T and Nap, J-P (2003) The release of genetically modified cops into the
environment. Part II: Overview of ecological assessment. The Plant Journal, 33: 19-46
[58] Ellstrand, N, Prentice, H and Hancock, J (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated
plants into their wild relatives. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 30: 539-563
[59] Lappe, M and Bailey, B (1998) Against the Grain: Biotechnology and the Corporate Takeover
of your Food. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press
[60] Gaugitsch, H (2002) Experience with environmental issues in GM crop production and the
likely future scenarios. Toxicology Letters, 127: 351-357
[61] Price, J, Hobson, R, Neale, M and Bruce, D (1996) Seed losses on commercial harvesting of
oilseed rape. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 65: 183-191
[62] Brown, P (2005) GM crops created superweed. The Guardian, 25th July
[63] Gruber, S, Pekrun, C and Claupein, W (2005) Life cycle and potential gene flow of volunteer
oilseed rape in different tillage systems. Weed Research, 45: 83-93
[64] Conner, A and Field, R (1995) Herbicide-resistant crops: A new approach to an old problem
or a radical new tool? In: McLean, G and Evand, G (Eds) Herbicide-resistant crops and pastures
in Australian farming systems. Canberra: Bureau of Resource Sciences: 53-71
[65] Morris, S (2006) EU biotech crop regulations and environmental risk: a case of the emperor’s
new clothes? Trends in Biotechnology, 25 (1): 2-6
[66] Dale, P, Clarke, B and Fontes, E (2002) Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic
crops. Nature Biotechnology, 20: 567-574
[67] Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology (2003) Have Transgenes, Will Travel: Issues
Raised by Gene Flow From Genetically Engineered Crops [Internet]. The Pew Charitable
Trusts. <http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_work_detail.aspx?id=442>. [Accessed April 2008]
[68] Gruber, S, Pekrun, C and Claupein, W (2004) Population dynamics of volunteer oilseed rape
(Brassica napus L.) affected by tillage. European Journal of Agronomy, 20 (4): 351-361
[69] Conner, A, Glare, T and Nap, J-P (2003) The release of genetically modified cops into the
environment. Part II: Overview of ecological assessment. The Plant Journal, 33: 19-46
[70] Losey, J, Rayor, L and Carter, M (1999) Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature,
399: 214
[71] Jesse, L and Obrycki, J (2000) Field deposition of Bt transgenic corn pollen: lethal effects on
the monarch butterfly. Oecologia, 125: 241-248
[72] Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology (2003) Have Transgenes, Will Travel: Issues
Raised by Gene Flow From Genetically Engineered Crops [Internet]. The Pew Charitable
Trusts. <http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_work_detail.aspx?id=442>. [Accessed April 2008]
[73] Wu, K, Peng,Y and Jia, S (2003) What we have learnt on. impacts of Bt cotton on non-target
organisms in China. Journal of Economic Entomology, 95: 826-831
[74] Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology (2002) Three Years Later: Genetically Engineered
Corn and the Monarch Butterfly Controversy [Internet]. The Pew Charitable Trusts
<http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_work_detail.aspx?id=442>. [Accessed April 2008]
[75] Latsch, G (2007) Are GM Crops Killing Bees? De Spiegel, 22nd March
[76] Arpaia, S. 1996. Ecological impact of Bt-transgenic plants: 1. Assessing possible effects of
cryIIIB toxin on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. J. Genet. Breed. 50: 315-319.
[77] Malone, L (2004) Potential effects of GM crops on honey bee health. Bee World, 85: 29-36
[78] Malone, L and Pham-Delègue, M (2001) Effects of transgene products on honey bees (Apis
mellifera) and bumblebees (Bombus sp.). Apidologie, 32: 287-304.
[79] Malone, L and Pham-Delègue, M (2002) Using proteins to assess the potential impacts of genetically
modified plants on honey bees. In: Devillers, J and Pham-Delègue, M (Eds.) Honey bees:
estimating the environmental impact of chemicals. London, UK: Taylor & Francis: 290-311
[80] O'Callaghan, M, Glare, T, Burgess, E and Malone, L (2005) Effects of plants genetically modified
for insect resistance on non-target organisms. Annual Review of Entomology, 50: 271-292
[81] Sanvido, O, Stark, M, Romeis, J and Bigler, F (2006) Ecological impacts of genetically modified
crops. Experiences from ten years of experimental field research and commercial cultivation.
ART-Schriftenreihe Nr. 01, Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART,
Switzerland
[82] Morandin, L and Winston, M (2003) Effects of novel pesticides on bumble bee (Hymenoptera:
Apidae) colony health and foraging ability. Environmental Entomology, 32 (3): 555-563
[83] Huang, Z, Hanley, A, Pett, W, Langenberger, M and Duan, J (2004) Field and semifield evaluation
of impacts of transgenic canola pollen on survival and development of worker honey
bees. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97:1517-1523
[84] Hole, D, Perkins, A, Wilson, J, Alexander, I, Grice, P and Evans, A (2005) Does organic
farming benefit biodiversity? Biological Conservation, 122 (1): 113-130
[85] United Nations (1993) Documents adopted by the Conference, UN sales no. E.93.I.8, United
Nations, New York
[86] Wood, D and Lenne, J (Eds) (1999) Agrobiodiversity: Characterization, Utiization and Management.
Wallingford: CABI
[87] Hyvönen, T, Ketoja, E, Salonen, J, Jalli, H and Tiainen, J (2003) Weed species diversity and
community composition in organic and conventional cropping of spring cereals. Agriculture,
Ecosystems & Environment, 97(1-3): 131-149
[88] Manhoudt, A, Visser, A and de Snoo, G (2007) Management regimes and farming practices
enhancing plant species richness on ditch banks. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,
119(3-4): 353-358
[89] Spangenberg, J (2007) Biodiversity pressure and the driving forces behind. Ecological Economics,
61: 146-158
[90] Witcombe, J (1999) Do farmer-participatory methods apply more to high potential areas than
to marginal ones? Outlook on Agriculture, 28
[91] FAO/WHO (2001) Codex Alimentarius: HACCP System and Guidelines for its Application.
Food Hygiene Basic Texts, FAO/WHO, Rome 2001
[92] Louwaars, N, Brandenburg, W, Gilissen, L, Kleter, G and Wagenaar, J (2002) The Biosafety Files,
a new link in biosafety information. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 49: 13-14

About this Article

TITLE:
IS GMO “SUSTAINABLE”? A REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS OF GM PLANTS IN COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC CROPS

AUTHORS:
Anna PRUSAK (1)
Gene ROWE (2)
Jacek STROJNY (3)

AUTHORS AFFILIATIONS:
(1) Department of Quality Management, Krakow University of Economics, Krakow
(2) Gene Rowe Evaluations, 12 Wellington Road, Norwich, UK;
(3) Department of Economics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow

JOURNAL:
Modern Management Review
21 (4/2014)

KEY WORDS AND PHRASES:
GMO, sustainability, environmental risks, food production

FULL TEXT:
http://doi.prz.edu.pl/pl/pdf/zim/148

DOI:
10.7862/rz.2014.mmr.55

URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7862/rz.2014.mmr.55

COPYRIGHT:
Publishing House of Rzeszow University of Technology Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow

POLITECHNIKA RZESZOWSKA im. Ignacego Łukasiewicza; al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów
tel.: +48 17 865 11 00, fax.: +48 17 854 12 60
Administrator serwisu: