Nasze serwisy używają informacji zapisanych w plikach cookies. Korzystając z serwisu wyrażasz zgodę na używanie plików cookies zgodnie z aktualnymi ustawieniami przeglądarki, które możesz zmienić w dowolnej chwili. Więcej informacji odnośnie plików cookies.

Obowiązek informacyjny wynikający z Ustawy z dnia 16 listopada 2012 r. o zmianie ustawy – Prawo telekomunikacyjne oraz niektórych innych ustaw.

Wyłącz komunikat



Logowanie za pomocą Centralnej Usługi Uwierzytelniania PRz. Po zakończeniu pracy nie zapomnij zamknąć przeglądarki.

Modern Management Review (dawna nazwa: Zarządzanie i Marketing)

Modern Management Review
(dawna nazwa: Zarządzanie i Marketing)
21 (3/2014), DOI: 10.7862/rz.2014.mmr.31



DOI: 10.7862/rz.2014.mmr.31


A practical joke (i.e. a prank) belongs to a category of disparagement humor, as it is a playful act held to amuse, tease or even mock the victim, and to entertain the audience. Alt-hough humor has been long exploited in broadcast and print advertising, the use of practical jokes is a more recent phenomenon esp. in digital marketing. The development of the Inter-net and social media creates new opportunities for using pranks as disguised adverts embed-ded in online strategies and there is an increasing number of companies which exploit pranks as a creative content solution for their on-line presence. As there is little academic endeavor devoted to this subject, this paper forwards a theoretical and practical framework for pranks. It recognizes pranks as innovative forms of digital advertising and it analyses their potential in terms of branding effectiveness (e.g. in maximizing brand reach, exposure, brand visibility, drawing consumer attention, eliciting strong emotions etc.). Possible prank effects are inferred from the theory of humor and from the secondary data collected by the authors of this paper. Key challenges, risks and limitations are discussed and relevant exam-ples are provided. The paper concludes with several research areas and questions to be ad-dressed in future empirical studies.

Full text (pdf)


[1] A dramatic surprise on a quiet square, (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[2] Barness S., LG Prank Makes People Think It's The End Of The World, “The Huffington Post”, 9 March 2013, (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[3] Bauman R., Story, Performance, and Event: Contextual Studies in Oral Narrative, Cambridge UP, Cambridge 1986, p. 144.
[4] Blake M., ‘Push here for Drama’: How a quiet Belgian town was turned into a live action movie, complete with punch-ups, gunfights and kidnap... and a sexy biker in lingerie, “Daily Mail”, 12 April 2012, (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[5] Busloads of kids get surprise trip to Toys“R”Us, q5SXybm6bss (accessed: 20 September 2014).
[6] De Pelsmacker P., Geuens M., The advertising effectiveness of different levels of intensity of humour and warmth and the moderating role of top of mind awareness and degree of product use, “Journal of Marketing Communications” 5/3 (1999), p. 113–129.
[7] Duncan C.P., Nelson J.E., Effects of Humor in a Radio Advertising Experiment, “Journal of Advertising” 14/2 (1985), p. 33–64.
[8] Eisend M., A meta-analysis of humor in advertising, “Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science” 2009/37, p. 191–203.
[9] Flaherty K., Weinberger M.G., Gulas C.S., The Impact of Perceived Humor, Product Type, and Humor Style in Radio Advertising, “Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertis-ing” 26/1 (2004), p. 25–36.
[10] Gelb B.D., Zinkhan G.M., Humor and advertising effectiveness after repeated exposures to a radio commercial, “Journal of Advertising” 15/2 (1986), p. 15–34.
[11] Gianatasio D., Prankvertising: Are Outrageous Marketing Stunts Worth the Risks? “Adweek”, 1 April 2013, (accessed: 1 September 2014).
[12] Gulas C.S., Weinberger M.G., Humor in Advertising: A Comprehensive Analysis, M.E. Sharpe, New York 2006.
[13] Heider F., The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Hillsdale, New Jersey 1958.
[14] Hsieh J.-K., Hsieh Y.-C., Tang Y.-C., Exploring the disseminating behaviors of eWOM mar-keting: persuasion in online video, “Electronic Commerce Research” 2012/12, s. 201–224.
[15] Jeff Gordon: Test Drive | Pepsi Max | Prank, Q5mHPo2yDG8 (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[16] Karpińska-Krakowiak M., Consumers, Play and Communitas – an Anthropological View on Building Consumer Involvement on a Mass Scale, “Polish Sociological Review” 3/187 (2014), p. 317–331.
[17] Kosner A.W., “Push To Add Drama” Video: Belgian TNT Advert Shows Virality of Manipu-lated Gestures, “Forbes”, 4 December 2012, 2012/04/12/push-to-add-drama-video-belgian-tnt-advert-shows-virality-of-manipulated-gestures/ (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[18] Lammers H.B., Liebowitz L., Seymour G.E., Hennessey J.E., Humor and cognitive response to advertising stimuli: A trace consolidation approach, “Journal of Business Research” 11/2 (1983), p. 173–185.
[19] LG pulls apocalyptic interview prank, “Telegraph”, 5 September 2013, (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[20] MacKenzie S.B, Lutz R.J., Belch G.E., The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations, “Journal of Marketing Research” 23/2 (1986), p. 130–143.
[21] MacKenzie S.B., Lutz R.J., An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context, “Journal of Marketing” 1989/53, p. 48–56.
[22] Madden T.J., Weinberger M.G., The effects of humor on attention in magazine advertising, “Journal of Advertising” 11/2 (1982), p. 8–14.
[23] Martin R.A., The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach, Elsevier, Amsterdam 2007.
[24] McCormack D., Welcome to the scariest job interview ever!, “Daily Mail”, 5 September 2013, (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[25] Media firms are making big bets on online video, still an untested medium, New York, 3 May 2014,
[26] Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T., The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion, “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology” 1986/19, p. 123–194.
[27] Petty R.E., Kasmer J., Haugtvedt C., Cacioppo J.T., Source and message factors in persua-sion: A reply to Stiffs critique of the Elaboration Likelihood Model, “Communication Mono-graphs” 1987/54, p. 233–249.
[28] Prilluk R., Till B.D., The role of contingency awareness, involvement, and need for cognition in attitude formation, “Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science” 32/3 (2004), p. 329–344.
[29] Raven D., Is this the world’s scariest job interview? LG give job applicants the fright of their lives, “Mirror”, 5 September 2013, (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[30] So Real it's Scary, (accessed: 22 Septem-ber 2014).
[31] Speck P.S., On humor and humor in advertising, Texas Tech University 1987 (Ph.D. Disserta-tion), se-quence=1 (accessed: 8 August 2014).
[32] Steward D.M., Furse D.H., Effective television advertising, D.C. Heath and Company, Chicago 1986.
[33] TNT's Red Button Ad Invites Users To “Push To Add Drama”, “Huffington Post”, 4 Novem-ber 2012, (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[34] Weinberger M.G., Gulas C.S., The Impact of Humor in Advertising: A Review, “Journal of Advertising” 21/4 (1992), p. 35–59.
[35] Weinberger M.G., Campbell L., Brody B., Effective Radio Advertising, Lexington Books, New York 1994.
[36] Weinberger M.G., Campbell L., The use and impact of humor in radio advertising, “Journal of Advertising Research” 31/12-01 (1991), p. 44–52.
[37] WestJet Christmas Miracle: real-time giving, (accessed: 22 September 2014).
[38] Woltman Elpers J.C.M., Mukherjee A., Hoyer W.D., Humor in television advertising: A mo-ment-to-moment analysis, “Journal of Consumer Research” 2004/31, p. 592–598.
[39] Zhang Y., Zinkhan G.M., Humor in Television Advertising, “Advances in Consumer Re-search” 1991/18, p. 813–818.
[40] Zillmann D., Williams B.R., Bryant J., Boynton K.R., Wolf M.A., Acquisition of information from educational television as a function of differently paced humorous inserts, “Journal of Educational Psychology” 72/2 (1980), p. 170–180.

About this Article



(1) Department of International Marketing and Retailing, Faculty of International and Political Studies, University of Lodz
(2) .Department of Marketing, Faculty of Management, University of Lodz

Modern Management Review
21 (3/2014)

a prank, brand, advertising online, prankvertising, brand management, ad-vertising strategy, humor




Publishing House of Rzeszow University of Technology Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow

POLITECHNIKA RZESZOWSKA im. Ignacego Łukasiewicza; al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów
tel.: +48 17 865 11 00, fax.: +48 17 854 12 60
Administrator serwisu:

Deklaracja dostępności | Polityka prywatności