Humanities and Social Sciences
(dawna nazwa: Ekonomia i Nauki Humanistyczne)
28 (3/21), DOI: 10.7862/rz.2021.hss.22
THE “WORK” OF ART: STANISŁAW BRZOZOWSKI AND BERNARD STIEGLER
Adrian MRÓZ
DOI: 10.7862/rz.2021.hss.22
Abstract
This article relates the ideas of Stanisław Brzozowski (1878–1911) with those of Bernard
Stiegler (1952–2020), both of whom problematize the “work” of art understood as a labor
practice. Through the conceptual analysis of epigenetics and epiphylogenetics for aesthetic
theory, I claim that both thinkers develop practical concepts relevant to contemporary art
philosophy. First, I present an overview of Brzozowski’s aesthetics, for whom literature and
the arts are linked with ethics, and aesthetic form is tied with moral judgment. Then, I continue
with an outline of Stiegler’s, for whom the role of artists is to sculpt a new culture and
historical epoch called the Neganthropocene. Finally, the notion of “work” as a type of
memory practice is analyzed. The comparison shows that Stiegler develops epigenetics
phenomenologically via memory (“tertiary retentions”) and phylogenetics to epiphylogenetics.
Both philosophers argue against determinism. This study suggests that their key
ideas advance and complement each other.
References
Brzozowski, S. (1910a). Epigenetyczna teorya historyi [In:] Idee. Lwów: Księgarnia Polska
B. Połonieckiego, p. 112–139.
—— (1910b). Materyalizm dziejowy jako filozofia kultury [In:] Idee. Lwów: Księgarnia Polska B. Połonieckiego, p. 1–13.
—— (2007). Głosy wśród nocy: Studya nad pozesileniem romantycznem kultury europejskiej (wyd. 2, krytyczne). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
—— (2010). Wybór pism estetycznych (T. Szkołut, ed., wyd. 1). Kraków: Universitas.
Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. “Analysis”, 58(1). DOI: 10.1093/
analys/58.1.7
Fitzpatrick, N. (2014). Symbolic Misery and Aesthetics – Bernard Stiegler. “Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics”, 6.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (2013). Jak zmienić świat: Marks i marksizm 1840–2011 (S. Szymański, Trans.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Klaman, J. (2005). “Our Points Of View” in Stanisław Brzozowski’s “Epigenetic Theory of History.” Pamiętnik Literacki”, 96(3).
Le Brun, A. (2018). Ce qui n’a pas de prix: Beauté, laideur et politique. Stock.
Maienschein, J. (2017). Epigenesis and Preformationism [In:] Zalta, E. N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Access on the internet: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/
epigenesis/
Nicoglou, A., Wolfe, C. T. (2018). Introduction: Sketches of a conceptual history of epigenesis. “History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences”, 40(4), DOI: 10.1007/s40656-018-0230-1.
Serpentine Galleries. (2018, November 15). Work Marathon 2018: Bernard Stiegler - Too Late? The Final Warning. Access on the internet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
EsGVN7UE0pw
Stiegler, B. (1998a). Technics and Time, 1. The Fault of Epimetheus (G. Collins & R. Beard-
sworth, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
—— (1998b). Technics and Time, 2. Disorientation (S. Barker, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
—— (2011). Technics and Time 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise (S. Barker, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
—— (2014a). Symbolic Misery, Vol. 1: The Hyperindustrial Epoch [In:] Symbolic Misery. Polity Press. DOI: 10.1353/con.2010.0011,
—— (2014b). The Re-Enchantment of the world: The value of spirit against Industrial Populism (T. Arthur, Trans.). Bloomsbury.
—— (2015). Symbolic Misery. Vol. 2. The Catastrophe of the Sensible. Polity Press.
—— (2017a). Kant, Art, and Time (S. Barker & A. De Boever, Trans.). “Boundary” 2, 44(1). DOI: 10.1215/01903659-3725845.
—— (2017b). The Proletarianization of Sensibility (A. De Boever, Trans.). “Boundary” 2, 44(1). DOI: 10.1215/01903659-3725833.
—— (2017c). The Quarrel of the Amateurs (R. Hughes, Trans.). “Boundary” 2, 44(1). DOI: 10.1215/01903659-3725857.
—— (2018). The Neganthropocene. Open Humanities Press.
—— (2019). The Age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Polity Press.
Sugy, P. (2018, June 30). Annie Le Brun: «L’art contemporain, c’est l’enlaidissement du monde !». Le Figaro.fr. Access on the internet: https://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/culture/
2018/06/30/31006-20180630ARTFIG00066-annie-le-brun-l-art-contemporain-c-est-l-enlaidissement-du-monde.php
Szkołut, T. (2008). Estetyka Stanisława Brzozowskiego [In:] Wilkoszewska, K., ed., Wybór pism estetycznych. Kraków: Universitas.
Velthuis, O., Coslor, E. (2012). The Financialization of Art. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199590162.013.0025.
Wojciszke, B. (2019). Psychologia społeczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Work Marathon | Serpentine Galleries (2018). Access on the internet: https://www.
serpentinegalleries.org/exhibitions-events/work-marathon
About this Article
TITLE:
THE “WORK” OF ART: STANISŁAW BRZOZOWSKI AND BERNARD STIEGLER
AUTHORS:
Adrian MRÓZ
AUTHORS AFFILIATIONS:
Department of Aesthetics at the Institute of Philosophy of the Jagiellonian
University in Kraków, 52 Grodzka St., 31-044 Kraków
JOURNAL:
Humanities and Social Sciences
28 (3/21)
KEY WORDS AND PHRASES:
art, work, Bernard Stiegler, Stanisław Brzozowski, aesthetics, Marxism
FULL TEXT:
http://doi.prz.edu.pl/pl/pdf/einh/579
DOI:
10.7862/rz.2021.hss.22
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7862/rz.2021.hss.22
COPYRIGHT:
Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów