Nasze serwisy używają informacji zapisanych w plikach cookies. Korzystając z serwisu wyrażasz zgodę na używanie plików cookies zgodnie z aktualnymi ustawieniami przeglądarki, które możesz zmienić w dowolnej chwili. Więcej informacji odnośnie plików cookies.

Obowiązek informacyjny wynikający z Ustawy z dnia 16 listopada 2012 r. o zmianie ustawy – Prawo telekomunikacyjne oraz niektórych innych ustaw.

Wyłącz komunikat

 
 

Logowanie

Logowanie za pomocą Centralnej Usługi Uwierzytelniania PRz. Po zakończeniu pracy nie zapomnij zamknąć przeglądarki.

Humanities and Social Sciences (dawna nazwa: Ekonomia i Nauki Humanistyczne)

Humanities and Social Sciences
(dawna nazwa: Ekonomia i Nauki Humanistyczne)
27 (2/2020), DOI: 10.7862/rz.2020.hss.14

SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE EASTERN EU ENLARGEMENT: THE PERSPECTIVE OF A CRITICAL SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH

Krzysztof CZUBOCHA, Krzysztof REJMAN
Submitted by: Paweł Perz

DOI: 10.7862/rz.2020.hss.14

Abstract

This paper claims that the assessment of the eastern EU enlargement depends on the
adopted theoretical perspective. The practitioners of critical approaches in sociology claim
that mainstream approaches to European integration suffer from neglect. Critical thinkers
provide an alternative account of European integration claiming that it can be conceptualized
as enforcement mechanism for the spread of neoliberal capitalism. The eastern EU
enlargement should be analyzed on the basis of world-systems theory and post-colonial
theory. From this point of view, the post-communist political, social and economic
transformations based on the neoliberal economic theory have produced mixed results.
Specifically, economic neoliberalism is a flawed economic theory that demonstrated its
weakness in the post-2008 period. Transnational capital exploited EU spaces to force
a neoliberal agenda on the candidate states by way of conditionality. Narrow sectoral interests
took precedence over economic rationality and social policy goals. Hence, the relative failure
of post-communist transformations in such domains as: EU cohesion policy, unstable
democracies, or demography undermining future economic growth prospects. Moreover, the
multidimensional crisis initiated by forcing the neoliberal agenda on the candidate states has
initiated adverse social and political developments on EU-wide scale in such domains as anti-
immigration backlash and the ascendancy of far-right political parties.

Full text (pdf)

References

Ådnanes, M. (2007). Social Transitions and Anomie among Post-Communist Bulgarian Youth.“Young”, 15(1).
Baylis, T.A. (2007). Embattled Executives: Prime Ministerial Weakness in East Central Europe.“Communist and Post-Communist Studies”, 40(1).

Behr, H., Stivachtis, Y.A. (2016). European Union: An empire in new clothes? [In:] Behr, H.,
Stivachtis, Y.A., eds., “Revisiting the European Union as Empire”. London–New York:
Routledge.

Berend, I.T., Bugaric, B. (2015). Unfinished Europe: Transition from Communism to Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. “Journal of Contemporary History”, 50(4).
Boje, T.P., Steenbergen, B., Walby, S. (2007). Introduction [In:] Boje, T.P., Steenbergen, B.,
Walby, S., eds., European Societies: Fusion Or Fission?. London – New York: Routledge.

4 Goodwin and Milazzo (2015) claim that immigration is central to Euroscepticism in Britain and the
ascendancy of right wing parties throughout Europe was based to a large extent on anti-immigrant
electoral platforms.


Social and political consequences of the eastern EU enlargement …

Böröcz, J. Sarkar, M. (2005). What is the EU? International Sociology, 20(2).
Böröcz, J., Smith, D.A. (1995). Introduction: Late Twentieth Century Challenges for World-

System Analysis [In:] Böröcz, J., Smith, D.A., eds, New World Order?: Global Transformations
in the Late Twentieth Century. Westport: Praeger.
Böröcz, J. (2016). An Incapacity to See Ourselves as Part of the Whole World, and the Insistence to See Ourselves as Part of Europe, LeftEast, December 14. Access on the internet:

https://www.criticatac.ro/lefteast/jozsef-borocz-interview-2016/ (Accessed 12.12.2019).
Brochmann, G., Erik, J., Jurado E. (2013). Introduction: Immigration, Work and Welfare:
Towards an integrated approach [In:] Brochmann, G., Jurado, E., eds., Europe's Immigration
Challenge: Reconciling Work, Welfare and Mobility. London–New York: I.B. Tauris & Co.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A. (2005). Introduction [In:] Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R.,
Donnelly, J., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C., True, J., eds., Theories of International Relations.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cafruny, A., Ryner, M. (2019). Alternative Perspectives on European Integration [In:] Jessop,
B., Overbeek, H., eds., Transnational Capital and Class Fractions: The Amsterdam School
Perspective Reconsidered. Abingdon: Routledge.

Casi, L., Resmini, L. (2012). Globalization, Foreign Direct Investments and Growth in
European Regions, an Empirical Assessment [In:] Capello, R., Ponce Dentinho, T., eds.,
Globalization Trends and Regional Development: Dynamics of FDI and Human Capital Flows.
Northampton: Edvard Elgar Publishing.

Covacs, M., Kabachnik, P. (2001). Shedding Light on the Quantitative Order: the EU’s
Discourse in the Commission Opinions of 1997 [In:] Böröcz, J., Covacs, M.J., eds., Empire’s
New Clothes: Unveiling EU Enlargement Telford: „Central Europe Review”. Access on the
internet: http://aei.pitt.edu/144/1/Empire.pdf (2018, September 15).

Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations

Theory.“Millennium – Journal of International Studies”, 10(2).
Devetak, R., (2005). Critical Theory [In:] Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J.,
Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C., True, J., eds., Theories of International Relations. Houndmills:
Palgrave Macmillan.

Drinkwater, S., Eade, J., Garapich, M. (2009). Poles apart? EU enlargement and the labour market outcomes of immigrants in the United Kingdom. “International Migration” 47(1).
Engel-Di Mauro, S. (2006). The European Union as Empire [In:] Engel-Di Mauro, S., ed., The
European's Burden: Global Imperialism in EU Expansion. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

European Quality of Life Survey (2016). Access on the internet: https://www.eurofound.
europa.eu/surveys/european-quality-of-life-surveys/european-quality-of-life-survey-2016
(2019, December 15).

Eurostat (2019a) Employment statistics, Access on the internet: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Employment_statistics (2019, February 14).
Eurostat (2019b) GDP per capita, consumption per capita and price level indices. Access on the
internet: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=GDP_per_capita,
_consumption_per_capita_and_price_level_indices (2019, January 28).

Goodwin, M., Milazzo, C. (2015). Britain, the European Union and the Referendum: What
drives Euroscepticism? Research report for Chatham House. Access on the internet:
https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/20151209Euroscepticis
mGoodwinMilazzo.pdf (2019, December 12).


K. Czubocha, K. RejmanGreskovits, B. (2000). Rival Views of Post-Communist Market Society: The path-dependence oftransitology [In:] Dobry, M., ed., Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for the Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Grødeland Å.B., Koshechkina, T.Y. Miller, W.L. (2001). A Culture of Corruption?: Coping with

Government in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Central European University Press.
Grzymala-Busse, A., Innes, A. (2003). Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political
Competition in East Central Europe. “East European Politics and Societies”, 17(1).

Haahr, J.H., Walters, W., (2006). Governing Europe [In:] Haahr, J.H., Walters, J., eds., Govern
ing Europe: Discourse, Governmentality and European Integration). London: Routledge.
Heyns, B. (2005). Emerging inequalities in Central and Eastern Europe.“Annual Review of
Sociology” 31.

Hooper, B., Kramsch, O. (2007). Post-Colonizing Europe: The Geopolitics of Globalization,
Empire and Borders: here and there, now and then. “Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale
geografie” 98(4).

Humrich, Ch. (2014). Critical theory [In:] Schieder, S., Spindler, M., eds., Theories of International Relations. Abingdon, Routledge.
Jakubek, J. (2008). Polish Experiences with European Policy Coordination 1991–2006 [In:] Cox,
T., Myant, M., eds., Reinventing Poland: Economic and Political Transformation and Evolving
National Identity. Abingdon: Routledge.

Kornai, J. (2006). The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe: Success and
Disappointment.“Economics of Transition”, 14(2). DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00252.x
(2019, December 12).

Kurki, M. (2011). Governmentality and EU Democracy Promotion: The European Instrument
for Democracy and Human Rights and the Construction of Democratic Civil Societies.
“International Political Sociology” 5(4).

Kuus, M. (2004). Europe's Eastern Expansion and the Reinscription of Otherness in

East-Central Europe. Progress in Human Geography 28(4). (2006). The Double Enlargement and the Remapping of the East [In:] Engel-Di Mauro, S., ed., The European's Burden: Global Imperialism in EU Expansion. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Maccartney, H. (2011). Variegated Neoliberalism: EU Varieties of Capitalism and Internationalpolitical economy. London – New York: Routledge.
Mateos, S., Morcillo Laiz, A. (2017). International Relations and Political Sociology [In:]
Outhwaite, W., ed., The SAGE Handbook of Political Sociology. London: Sage.

Meardi, G. 2012. Social Failures of EU Enlargement: A case of workers voting with their feet.Abingdon: Routledge.
Neunhöffer, G., Plehwe, D., Walpen, B. (2006). Introduction: Reconsidering Neoliberal
Hegemony [In:] Neunhöffer, G., Plehwe, D., Walpen, B., eds., Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global
Critique. Abingdon: Routledge.

Ost, D. (2006). The Defeat of Solidarity: Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe. Ithaka:Cornell University Press.
Ostrachshenko, V., Popova, O. (2014). Life (Dis)satisfaction and the Intention to Migrate:
Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. “The Journal of Socio-Economics” 48(1).

Pijl, van der, K. (2014). The Discipline of Western Supremacy: Modes of Foreign Relations and
Political Economy. London: Pluto Press.


Rumford, Ch. (2008). Cosmopolitan Spaces: Europe, Globalization, Theory. Abingdon:Routledge.
Schimmelfenning, F. Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by Conditionality: EU rule transfer to
the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4).

Shlapentokh, V., Vanderpool, C.K., (1999). Introduction [In:] Doktorov, B.Z., Shlapentokh, V.,
Vanderpool, C.K., eds., The New Elite in Post-communist Eastern Europe. College Station:
Texas A&M University Press.

Silbey, S. (2005). After Legal Consciousness.“The Annual Review of Law and SocialScience” 1.
Staniszkis, J. (2009). Antropologia władzy. Między Traktatem Lizbońskim a kryzysem.
Warszawa, Prószyński i S-ka.

Sztompka, P. (2000). The Ambivalence of Social Change: Triumph or Trauma?“PolishSociological Review”, 131(3).
United Nations Development Programme (2011) Average annual population growth rate (%).
Access on the internet: https://data.undp.org/dataset/Average-annual-population-growth-rate/
gjtv-43ai (2019, January 14).

Vachudova, M.A. (2009). Corruption and Compliance in the EU's PostCommunist Membersand Candidates. “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, Supplement 47.
Vanhuysse, P. (2007). Workers without Power: Agency, legacies, and labor decline in East
European varieties of capitalism. “Czech Sociological Review”, 43(3).

Wallerstein, I. (2005). World-systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke UniversityPress.
Walters, W. (2004). The Political Rationality of European Integration [In:] Larner, W., Walters,
W., eds., Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces. London: Routledge.

Włoch, R. (2015). Teoria krytyczna [In:] Zięba, R., Bieleń, S., Zając, J., eds., Teorie i podejścia
badawcze w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Warszawa: Wydział Dziennikarstwa
i Nauk Politycznych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

Zybertowicz, A. (2001). Konstruktywizm jako orientacja metodologiczna w badaniach społecznych.
„Kultura i Historia”, 2001(1), Access on the internet: http://www.kulturaihistoria.
umcs.lublin.pl/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Kultura-i-Historia-nr-1.pdf (2019, December 12).

About this Article

TITLE:
SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE EASTERN EU ENLARGEMENT: THE PERSPECTIVE OF A CRITICAL SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH

AUTHORS:
Krzysztof CZUBOCHA (1)
Krzysztof REJMAN (2)

AUTHORS AFFILIATIONS:
(1) PhD, Assistant Proffesor at State Higher School of Technology and Economics in Jarosław, Faculty of International Relations, ul. Czarnieckiego 16, 37-500 Jarosław
(2) DSc, PhD, Associate Prof., professor at Rzeszów University of Technology,
Faculty of Management, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów

SUBMITTED BY:
Paweł Perz

JOURNAL:
Humanities and Social Sciences
27 (2/2020)

KEY WORDS AND PHRASES:
EU integration, critical theory, East-Central Europe, transformation, EU enlargement, neoliberal capitalism.

FULL TEXT:
http://doi.prz.edu.pl/pl/pdf/einh/521

DOI:
10.7862/rz.2020.hss.14

URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7862/rz.2020.hss.14

COPYRIGHT:
Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów

POLITECHNIKA RZESZOWSKA im. Ignacego Łukasiewicza; al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów
tel.: +48 17 865 11 00, fax.: +48 17 854 12 60
Administrator serwisu:

Deklaracja dostępności | Polityka prywatności